Direct mail consists of physical marketing pieces—postcards, letters, catalogs, and dimensional packages—sent through USPS or private carriers to specific households or entire postal routes. Unlike digital advertising that relies on screens and clicks, direct mail lands in physical mailboxes where recipients can hold, examine, and keep the materials for later reference.
You see direct mail everywhere: restaurant coupons in your mailbox, real estate postcards announcing new listings, retail catalogs before holiday seasons, and nonprofit fundraising letters. Brands use Every Door Direct Mail (EDDM) to saturate entire neighborhoods without purchasing mailing lists, or send targeted pieces to purchased lists based on demographics, purchase history, or geographic location.
Brands typically use direct mail for customer acquisition, reactivating dormant customers, driving local store traffic, and promoting high-consideration purchases. A furniture retailer might send dimensional samples to prospects, while a political campaign uses EDDM to reach every voter in a district. The channel works particularly well for audiences that spend less time online and for products that benefit from physical demonstration or extended consideration periods.
Direct mail differs from digital marketing in its permanence and tactile nature. While an email disappears after deletion, a postcard sits on a kitchen counter for days or weeks. This persistence creates multiple exposure opportunities and allows for longer decision-making processes, which explains why direct mail often shows strong performance for high-value purchases and local services.
Measuring direct mail presents unique challenges that don't exist with digital channels. When someone clicks a Facebook ad and purchases immediately, attribution is straightforward. But direct mail creates a more complex path: someone receives a postcard, visits a website days later, and makes a purchase while also seeing retargeting ads and email campaigns.
Marketers rely on several types of data signals to track direct mail performance. They match customer addresses against mailing lists to identify who received pieces, track responses through unique promo codes and personalized URLs, and monitor sales lift in mailed regions compared to unmailed areas. Many brands also conduct surveys to understand how recipients discovered their products.
The core challenge is proving causation rather than correlation. Just because someone who received mail later made a purchase doesn't mean the mail caused that purchase—they might have bought anyway. Traditional tracking methods like promo codes capture only direct responses, missing people who saw the mail but didn't use the code. Meanwhile, simply matching purchases to mailed addresses can't distinguish between purchases the mail actually drove versus those that would have happened regardless.
Geo experiments divide markets into treatment and control groups, sending mail to some regions while withholding it from others. Advanced versions use synthetic controls, which create statistical twins of treated markets using historical data patterns from similar untreated markets.
This method measures total incremental impact across all channels, including online purchases, retail sales, and long-term brand effects. It provides causal measurement instead of correlation and works regardless of whether recipients use promo codes or trackable links. Geo experiments capture the full customer journey, from initial mail exposure through final purchase.
The method requires sufficient geographic scale to detect meaningful differences and faces complications when people travel between treated and untreated areas. Small businesses with limited geographic reach may lack the market size needed for reliable results. Additionally, establishing proper synthetic controls requires sophisticated statistical modeling and clean historical data.
Split-list testing randomly divides a mailing file into groups that receive different treatments—one group gets the mail, another serves as a withheld control, or multiple groups test different creative approaches. Marketers then compare response rates and conversion metrics across groups.
This approach provides clean causal measurement at the individual level and integrates easily into existing campaign operations. Testing different creative elements, offers, or formats reveals what drives performance improvements. The randomization eliminates selection bias that could skew results.
Withholding mail from potential customers creates opportunity costs, especially for house file campaigns to existing customers. Small lift effects require large sample sizes to achieve statistical significance, making testing expensive for low-volume mailers. The method also requires careful list management to ensure proper randomization and prevent contamination between test cells.
Matchback analysis connects customer purchases to mailing records by matching buyer addresses against the list of mail recipients. This creates individual-level attribution showing which customers received mail and subsequently converted within a specified time window, typically 60-90 days.
The method provides granular, customer-level insights and works with existing customer databases without requiring additional campaign instrumentation. It reveals purchase timing patterns and helps calculate metrics like cost per acquisition. Matchback analysis also enables sophisticated segmentation to understand which customer types respond best.
Matchback significantly undercounts true impact because it misses purchases where addresses don't perfectly match—gifts shipped to different addresses, retail purchases, or customers who moved. It cannot prove causation without a control group, and the attribution window choice dramatically affects results. Someone might purchase 95 days after receiving mail, falling outside the measurement window despite being influenced by the piece.
Front-end tracking uses unique promo codes, personalized URLs (PURLs), QR codes, or dedicated phone numbers printed on mail pieces. Recipients who use these trackable elements can be directly attributed to the campaign, often with real-time visibility into response patterns.
These tracking mechanisms provide immediate feedback on campaign performance and integrate seamlessly with digital analytics platforms. QR codes bridge physical mail with digital experiences, enabling sophisticated retargeting and customer journey mapping. The data helps optimize future campaigns by revealing which creative elements drive engagement.
Most recipients don't use tracking codes even when influenced by the mail, leading to substantial undercounting. Someone might see a postcard, remember the brand, and purchase later through organic search without using the provided promo code. Tracking adoption varies significantly by audience demographics, with older audiences often ignoring QR codes while younger audiences might expect them.
Test-calibrated marketing mix modeling combines experimental results with statistical modeling to understand how direct mail contributes to overall business performance. The model incorporates data from geo experiments and randomized tests to calibrate its understanding of causal relationships, then projects performance across different budget scenarios.
This approach provides strategic guidance for budget allocation across all marketing channels, accounting for interaction effects and diminishing returns. It captures long-term brand building effects that experiments might miss and enables scenario planning for different investment levels. The calibration process ensures the model reflects true causal relationships rather than statistical correlations.
Marketing mix modeling requires extensive data and sophisticated statistical expertise, making it accessible mainly to larger organizations. The models operate at aggregate levels, providing less granular insights than individual customer tracking. Results depend heavily on the quality and representativeness of the experimental data used for calibration.
Direct mail measurement transforms a traditionally opaque channel into a strategic asset. Without proper measurement, you operate on assumptions about which lists, formats, and offers drive actual business results. The difference between measured and unmeasured campaigns often determines whether direct mail becomes a profitable growth channel or an expensive experiment.
Budget decisions depend on understanding true incrementality, not just response rates. A campaign with a 3% response rate might generate zero incremental revenue if those customers would have purchased anyway through other channels. Conversely, a 1% response rate campaign might deliver exceptional incremental returns. Measurement reveals these differences and guides resource allocation.
Consider how measurement insights change execution strategies. When Pernod Ricard measured their Vegas Sphere activation using geo holdouts, they discovered a 4.71% lift in depletions - concrete evidence that justified expensive premium placements. Without measurement, such activations remain marketing theater. Similarly, brands often discover through proper testing that their house lists dramatically outperform rented lists, or that dimensional mailers to small VIP segments generate higher returns than broad postcard campaigns.
Measurement also reveals timing effects that improve campaign planning. Attribution windows of 60-90 days often show continued conversions long after digital channels stop driving measurable activity. This insight helps justify direct mail's higher upfront costs and informs seasonal planning decisions.
Direct mail works best when you have clear customer segments, sufficient budget for meaningful tests, and patience for longer conversion cycles. Consider this channel when you need to reach customers who are harder to target digitally, when you're launching in specific geographic markets, or when you're seeking a privacy-durable activation method that doesn't depend on cookies or tracking pixels.
The channel particularly suits high-consideration purchases, local business activation, and re-engagement campaigns. If you sell products with average order values above $50, serve local markets through physical locations, or need to reactivate dormant customers, direct mail often delivers strong returns. B2B companies find dimensional mailers effective for reaching decision makers who filter out digital advertising.
Avoid direct mail when you need immediate scale, have very low margins, or lack the operational capacity for list hygiene and campaign setup. The channel requires 3-6 weeks from brief to mailbox, minimum volumes typically starting at 200 pieces, and upfront investment in list preparation. If your business model depends on same-day customer acquisition or sub-$10 customer acquisition costs, digital channels likely serve you better.
Start with a simple test using existing customer data. Export your customer database, run it through CASS certification and NCOA processing to clean addresses, and design a randomized split test where half receive mail and half serve as a control group. Use a clear offer, include a unique promo code or QR code, and track both direct responses and overall sales to both groups over 60-90 days.
Common pitfalls include undersized test groups that can't detect meaningful lifts, attribution windows that are too short for the channel, and relying solely on promo code redemptions to measure success. Many marketers also skip list hygiene steps, leading to high undeliverable rates that inflate true costs per reached customer.
Begin by auditing your customer data quality and determining your primary success metric. Export customer addresses and run them through postal certification services like CASS and NCOA to identify valid, current addresses. This step alone often reveals that 10-15% of customer addresses need updating.
Design your first test as a simple postcard to existing customers with a clear offer and unique tracking code. Split your clean customer list randomly, with 70% receiving mail and 30% held as a control group. Include both a promo code and QR code linking to a dedicated landing page. Set your success metric - new orders, revenue, or store visits - and plan to measure both groups for 90 days.
For geographic testing scenarios where you need to measure regional activations, consider using Haus Fixed Geo Tests. This approach works well when you're testing local market entry, store openings, or regional promotions where individual-level randomization isn't feasible. Haus creates synthetic control groups using similar geographic areas to estimate incremental lift from your mailed regions.
Start small with 1,000-2,000 pieces to learn operational requirements and establish baseline response rates. Use this initial campaign to understand your fulfillment timeline, creative production needs, and measurement systems before scaling to larger volumes.
Partner with vendors who can handle both the technical aspects - list processing, postal regulations, printing - and provide measurement capabilities like matchback analysis. Services like Lob offer programmatic mail sending with built-in tracking, while traditional direct mail agencies provide full-service campaign management including advanced list strategies and creative optimization.
Once you establish baseline performance, expand testing to different customer segments, creative formats, and offers. The key is building systematic knowledge about what drives incremental results in your specific business context, rather than chasing industry benchmark response rates that may not reflect your customer behavior.
Make better ad investment decisions with Haus.
Whether you’re new to incrementality or a testing veteran, The Laws of Incrementality apply no matter your measurement stack, industry, or job family.
Incrementality = experiments
Not all incrementality experiments are created equal
Incrementality is a continuous practice
Incrementality is unique to your business
Acting on incrementality improves your business
