Out-of-home advertising encompasses any paid visual advertising people encounter outside their homes. This includes roadside billboards, transit advertising on buses and trains, digital screens in airports and malls, street furniture like bus shelter displays, and experiential activations at events. Unlike digital advertising that targets individuals through browsers or apps, OOH reaches audiences based on where they physically go during their daily routines.
You see OOH advertising when driving on highways past large bulletins, waiting at bus stops with poster displays, walking through Times Square's digital spectaculars, or shopping in malls with video screens. Brands use OOH to build awareness at scale, target specific geographic markets, drive foot traffic to stores, and create memorable brand moments through large-format creative executions.
OOH differs from digital advertising in fundamental ways. Rather than targeting individuals based on browsing behavior or demographics, it targets locations and contexts. A billboard near a shopping center reaches people when they're close to making purchase decisions. A transit ad reaches commuters during specific parts of their day. This geographic and contextual targeting makes OOH particularly effective for local businesses, store openings, and campaigns that benefit from reaching people in relevant physical locations.
Measuring OOH presents unique challenges because exposure happens in the physical world without the click-through tracking available in digital channels. When someone sees a billboard while driving, there's no automatic digital record of that exposure tied to their later purchase behavior. This creates what marketers call the attribution problem - proving that OOH advertising actually caused business outcomes rather than just correlating with them.
Marketers rely on several types of signals to understand OOH performance. They use traffic counts and visibility studies to estimate how many people likely saw their ads. They track mobile location data to see if people who passed billboard locations later visited their stores. They measure changes in brand awareness through surveys in markets where they ran campaigns. They monitor sales data in geographic areas with and without OOH campaigns to identify lift patterns.
The core challenge remains proving causation rather than correlation. Just because sales increased in a market with billboard advertising doesn't prove the billboards caused the increase - other factors like seasonality, competitor actions, or economic conditions could explain the change. This makes it difficult to calculate return on investment with the same precision as digital channels that offer direct click-to-purchase tracking.
Geopath, the OOH industry's measurement organization, provides standardized audience estimates for advertising inventory. They map traffic patterns using vehicle counts, mobile device data, and connected car information, then apply visibility models to estimate how many people actually notice each billboard or display. These models account for factors like viewing distance, travel speed, and surrounding visual clutter to convert raw traffic counts into "opportunity to see" impressions.
This method measures reach, frequency, and demographic composition well. It provides a consistent planning currency that lets marketers compare different OOH locations and formats. Media buyers use these metrics to negotiate rates and plan campaigns that achieve target audience goals.
The limitation is that these remain estimates of exposure opportunity, not proof of actual attention or business impact. The models make assumptions about human behavior and attention that may not reflect reality. A billboard might receive high Geopath ratings but fail to drive results if the creative doesn't resonate or if people are distracted while passing. These metrics also use annualized averages that might miss the specific conditions during shorter promotional campaigns.
Also called Fixed Geo Tests, these experiments compare business outcomes between geographic areas that received OOH advertising and similar areas that didn't. Marketers define treatment regions where they run billboard campaigns, then identify control regions with similar characteristics but no OOH exposure. By measuring sales, orders, or other business metrics in both areas, they can estimate the incremental impact of the advertising.
This method measures true causal impact on business outcomes like sales and customer acquisition. It doesn't rely on personal data or tracking pixels, making it durable against privacy changes. When executed properly, it provides the clearest answer to whether OOH advertising actually drives incremental business results.
The approach requires reliable outcome data broken down by geography, which not all businesses have access to. Regional spillover effects can bias results when people exposed to ads in treatment areas make purchases in control areas, though this can be mitigated by careful geographic boundary selection. The method also isn't practical for very small, localized campaigns where defining meaningful test and control areas becomes difficult.
Companies like Placer.ai track anonymized mobile device locations to identify people who passed by OOH advertising locations, then monitor whether these exposed audiences visit retail locations at higher rates than unexposed control groups. They use GPS and Wi-Fi signals to map device movements and infer advertising exposure and subsequent store visits.
This method directly measures foot traffic impact, making it valuable for retail-focused campaigns. It provides behavioral data rather than relying on survey responses about intended actions. The measurement can be relatively fast, showing results during or shortly after campaigns run.
Mobile location data suffers from panel biases since it only captures people who opt into location sharing and use apps that provide this data. Different vendors use different methodologies and have varying geographic coverage, leading to inconsistent results. The attribution modeling faces challenges in dense retail areas where multiple brands advertise simultaneously. Privacy regulations continue to limit data availability, and the accuracy can vary significantly by location and vendor methodology.
These studies combine survey research measuring brand awareness, consideration, and purchase intent with analysis of point-of-sale data or distributor records. Researchers survey consumers in markets with and without OOH campaigns to measure differences in brand metrics, while separately analyzing sales data from the same geographic areas to identify lift patterns.
This approach provides direct measurement of brand impact that stakeholders can easily interpret. It captures both upper-funnel brand building effects and bottom-line sales impact. The combination of attitudinal and behavioral data gives a complete picture of campaign effectiveness across the marketing funnel.
Survey research carries sampling limitations and costs that increase with sample size requirements. People don't always accurately recall advertising exposure or report true purchase intentions. Point-of-sale data isn't always accessible or standardized across different retail channels. For longer consideration purchases, the measurement window needs to extend well beyond the campaign period, making it harder to isolate the OOH impact from other marketing activities and external factors.
The measurement landscape for OOH continues evolving as privacy regulations limit mobile tracking and new technologies enable more sophisticated attribution. The most effective measurement strategies combine multiple methods rather than relying on any single approach, using each method's strengths to compensate for others' limitations.
Out-of-home advertising has historically operated on faith more than facts. Marketers spend on billboards and transit ads based on estimated impressions, then hope for the best. This approach wastes money and limits your ability to optimize campaigns.
Measurement transforms OOH from a brand-building gamble into a performance channel. When Jones Road Beauty measured their NYC digital billboard campaign, they discovered a 9% lift in new orders—but also learned their cost per incremental acquisition needed improvement for profitability. Without measurement, they would have either continued overspending or abandoned a channel that was actually working.
This data directly connects to budget decisions. Pernod Ricard's measurement of their Jameson campaign on the Las Vegas Sphere showed a 4.71% increase in warehouse depletions, providing concrete evidence to justify the investment. When you can prove OOH drives incremental sales, you can defend budget allocations and secure more investment.
Measurement insights change how you execute future campaigns. If footfall data shows your bus shelter ads drive store visits but your highway billboards don't, you shift spend accordingly. If geo-experiments reveal that four-week flights perform better than two-week flights, you adjust campaign duration. Without measurement, you repeat the same mistakes indefinitely.
The measurement also reveals unexpected opportunities. Many marketers discover that OOH works best in combination with other channels, creating amplification effects they can't see without proper attribution. This leads to better media mix decisions and more effective integrated campaigns.
Use OOH measurement when you have clear business objectives and the infrastructure to track them. If you're launching a new product, opening stores, or building brand awareness in specific markets, OOH measurement can prove which placements and creative approaches drive results.
The channel works best when you can define success geographically. Store openings, regional product launches, and market-specific brand campaigns are ideal candidates. You need reliable outcome data—sales by region, store visits, or online orders by market—to measure effectively.
Don't use OOH measurement if you need immediate, last-click attribution for low-value transactions. A direct-to-consumer business selling $20 products with one-time purchases will struggle to justify the measurement investment. The channel requires patience and larger transaction values to show clear returns.
Skip OOH if your business operates entirely online without geographic patterns. If customers come from everywhere and buy at random times, you can't create the geographic treatment and control groups needed for proper measurement.
Start with a small test in one or two markets. Choose locations where you have reliable sales data and can clearly define the exposed geography. Run the campaign for at least four weeks—shorter flights often don't provide enough signal to measure accurately.
Focus on formats you can control and measure precisely. Digital billboards in defined metro areas work better than scattered highway bulletins across multiple states. Place-based networks in malls or airports create cleaner geographic boundaries than broad regional buys.
Avoid common pitfalls that compromise measurement. Don't run other new marketing activities in your test markets during the OOH flight—you won't be able to separate the effects. Don't choose markets that are too small to generate meaningful sales volume or too large to create clear treatment boundaries.
Plan your measurement approach before you buy media, not after. The media plan should support measurement, with clear geographic boundaries and sufficient flight duration. Many marketers buy first and measure later, creating impossible attribution challenges.
Define your success metric first. If you sell through retail stores, focus on store visits or sales lift by market. If you're direct-to-consumer, track online orders by geography. If you're building brand awareness, plan brand lift surveys in exposed versus unexposed markets.
Set up data collection before your campaign launches. Ensure you can track your chosen metric by geography throughout the flight and for several weeks after. If you're measuring store visits, contract with a footfall vendor like Placer.ai. If you're measuring sales, confirm you have reliable data by market.
For sales measurement, consider using Haus Fixed Geo Tests, which create synthetic control groups to isolate OOH impact. The platform launched specifically to measure campaigns like billboards and regional activations that can't be randomized. You define the treated geography, and Haus compares results to similar unexposed areas.
Choose your test markets carefully. Pick 2-4 metropolitan areas with clear boundaries and sufficient business volume. Avoid markets where you're running other new campaigns or facing unusual business conditions. The test areas should be large enough to generate meaningful data but small enough to afford comprehensive coverage.
Plan a flight duration of at least four weeks. Shorter campaigns often don't provide enough signal to measure incremental impact. Budget for comprehensive coverage within your test markets—sparse coverage makes measurement difficult and reduces campaign effectiveness.
Include direct response elements in your creative. Add QR codes, unique URLs, or promo codes to capture immediate response data alongside your main measurement approach. This provides early signals and helps validate your primary measurement method.
Build measurement costs into your budget from the start. Geo-experiments, footfall measurement, and brand lift studies require separate investment beyond media spend. Plan for 10-15% of media spend on measurement, more for sophisticated approaches.
Track performance throughout the flight using available real-time data. Monitor QR code scans, promo code usage, and website traffic from exposed markets. While these don't provide full attribution, they indicate whether your campaign is generating response.
After the campaign, analyze results across all measurement methods. Compare geo-experiment results with footfall data and direct response metrics. Look for consistent patterns that validate your findings and inform future campaign decisions.
Document learnings and apply them systematically. If certain markets, formats, or creative approaches perform better, adjust your next campaign accordingly. If measurement reveals that OOH amplifies other channels, build integrated campaigns that maximize this effect.
Use insights to optimize your broader media strategy. Strong OOH incrementality data can justify increased investment and better budget allocation across channels. Weak results help you avoid wasting money on ineffective placements or markets.
]
[a]This should just be called Fixed Geo Tests
Make better ad investment decisions with Haus.
Whether you’re new to incrementality or a testing veteran, The Laws of Incrementality apply no matter your measurement stack, industry, or job family.
Incrementality = experiments
Not all incrementality experiments are created equal
Incrementality is a continuous practice
Incrementality is unique to your business
Acting on incrementality improves your business
